Gary V wrote: > This is a SpamAssassin issue, but generally it appears your Bayes > could use some manual training: > http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
Okay, so I used to deal with Bayes quite a bit. I spent a very long time specially training my Bayes database, and it seemed to work. Now, the spammers are putting lots of junk text in their spam and polluting the databases to such an extend that Bayes is much less useful. So I guess I'm saying that I have very little interest in spending the effort to retrain a new Bayes database, and none of my other users are capable or clueful enough to do so. Short of disabling Bayes entirely, is there anything I can do with minimal effort that yields a minimal return? I'm just not convinced that Bayes databases are going to stack up well against the modern bayes-scatter spam. -- Jo Rhett Network/Software Engineer Net Consonance ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
