Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Short of disabling Bayes entirely, is there anything I can do with > minimal effort that yields a minimal return? I'm just not convinced > that Bayes databases are going to stack up well against the modern > bayes-scatter spam.
In fact they are less effective against just-an-URL kind of spam, but these can probably be caught with SA rules. Bayes filters are still sort of efficient if there are sufficient features remaining, such as deliberate misspellings of keywords -- and spammers still use lots of these. -- Matthias Andree ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
