On 4/17/08, Gary V wrote:
> On 4/17/08, Louis Munro wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I am trying to set a different policy (using a policy bank) for outgoing
> > email for some networks. I am using postfix with a cidr map to route
> > that traffic to a different port on amavisd. I have set up a policy bank
> > with different values for some variables but only some of those seem to
> > actually have any effect. The others are either ignored or rejected when
> > amavis loads the policy banks with a line like :
> > (!)loading policy bank "POLICY-OUT": unknown field "spam_quarantine_to"
> >
> > Here is the policy as configured in amavisd.conf
> >
> > $policy_bank{'POLICY-OUT'} = {
> > log_level => 3,
> > spam_quarantine_to => undef,
> > spam_kill_level_maps => [7.0],
> > spam_dsn_cutoff_level_maps => undef,
> > virus_admin_maps => [ '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' ],
> > };
> >
> > $interface_policy{'11025'} = 'POLICY-OUT';
> >
> > In this case, it sets the $log_level, $spam_kill_level_maps and
> > $virus_admin_maps correctly, but the @spam_dsn_cutoff_level_maps is
> > unaffected as is the $spam_quarantine_to.
> >
> > What I want is to never quarantine and always send out a dsn for these
> > networks.
> >
> > Does anyone know what I'm missing?
> >
> > I'm running postfix 2.2 and amavisd-new 2.5.3.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Louis
> >
>
> spam_quarantine_to is not a valid policy bank key. Read the bottom of
> amavisd.conf-default for a list of keys.
>
> quarantine_method_by_ccat => {CC_SPAM, undef},
> spam_dsn_cutoff_level_maps => [9999],
> spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps => [9999],
>
> spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps was introduced in 2.4.3, and in a
> policy bank it seems you need to set both
> spam_dsn_cutoff_level_bysender_maps and spam_dsn_cutoff_level_maps if
> your version is 2.4.3 or newer and you want spam bounces. BTW, you
> might also need to add:
>
> final_spam_destiny => D_BOUNCE,
>
But since you are discarding mail, I wonder if it might be better to
pass the spam, but notify the sender (depending on whether the senders
are considered spammers or not).
final_spam_destiny => D_PASS,
warnspamsender => 1,
I'm not sure if warnspamsender works here, or if it would require some
form of warnsender_by_ccat =>
(of which the syntax eludes me).
--
Gary V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
