Hi again Simo,

2012/1/11 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>

> Hi all mates,
>
> I just did a little of work for cleaning the poms, I think that the
> svn repo needs to be tided-up as well, so since I've been missing the
> project for a long while, I am here to ask you that have been more
> involved.
>
> first consideration: IIUC, actually all big players abandoned version
> 1.0(a) of the OAuth protocol and everybody is focused on 2.0 only
>
> second consideration: the 1.0 implementation is rather than close to
> be finalized - OTOH current 2.0 is impressive!
>
> third consideration: we haven't done a release in 2 years, I think we
> should working towards the release and thinking about the fastest way
> to reach it :)
>

yes, definitely :-)


>
> So, my proposal is opening an attic/sandbox/dormant (not included in
> the POM build) where moving older stuff such as oauth-1.0, server,
> signature-api, spec-api, ... and promoting oauth-2.0/* in the top
> level.
>
> WDYT? Does it make sense? Do we have to start a formal vote to find a
> general agreement on this?
>

I think it does make a lot of sense, I do think that most of the interest
right now is on the oauth-2.0 stuff we have so maybe we can put them
inside, i.e., a sandbox and keep focusing on the oauth-2.0 things.

I think that if all the committers share their opinions here in this thread
then we don't need a formal vote, vicevers it may be better.

My 2 cents,
Tommaso



>
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!!!
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>

Reply via email to