Hi On Jan 11, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all mates, > > I just did a little of work for cleaning the poms, I think that the > svn repo needs to be tided-up as well, so since I've been missing the > project for a long while, I am here to ask you that have been more > involved. > > first consideration: IIUC, actually all big players abandoned version > 1.0(a) of the OAuth protocol and everybody is focused on 2.0 only > > second consideration: the 1.0 implementation is rather than close to > be finalized - OTOH current 2.0 is impressive! > > third consideration: we haven't done a release in 2 years, I think we > should working towards the release and thinking about the fastest way > to reach it :) How about set up a wiki page listing the goal to be achieved in order to achieve a new release (and maybe another one for the graduation, if not too early :S)? > > So, my proposal is opening an attic/sandbox/dormant (not included in > the POM build) where moving older stuff such as oauth-1.0, server, > signature-api, spec-api, ... and promoting oauth-2.0/* in the top > level. +1 also for me with a little but... I do agree with you that the 1.0(a) stuff is kind of obsolete at this point. I would do an exception for the client part though. Namely IMHO it would be nice to have a nice common API for the client that would work with both the 1.0(a)/2.0 implementation. How does it sounds? > > WDYT? Does it make sense? Do we have to start a formal vote to find a > general agreement on this? > > Many thanks in advance, all the best!!! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/
