Hi, Antonio. Thank you for driving the efforts.
Can we run a quick scan of the code base to understand which part of the source was from Univ. of Newcastle? Raymond On Mar 12, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > Hi *, > > as you probably know at this stage seems that we are kind of stuck due this > IP clearance issue. > My understanding is also that people might be "afraid" on committing code to > the current trunk/oauth-2.0 since there is a risk that the contribution might > be "lost" due IP issues (question: how much "real" is this risk??). > Taking the risk to be a bit harsh here I'd have the following proposal in > order to move forward (please do contradict me if you do not agree or have > any other proposal): > > - I'd focus contribution on brand new area/modules avoiding IP related issue. > > IANAL and I could be totally wrong here so I'll try to articulate my proposal > with an example. > AMBER-41 [0] is a brand new topic not implemented in Amber. If I'll create a > new module e.g. oauth2-resourceserver.mac that leverages other module > oauth2-resourceserver, oauth2-common we should be "safe". > Namely if one day we NEED to rewrite oauth2-common from scratch (again this > is just hypothetical) we can keep oauth2-resourceserver.mac . > > WDYT? Apologies again if this sounds kind of pessimistic but I have been > taught to "hope for the best and plan for the worst" > > Regards > > Antonio > > > [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBER-41 > > On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > >> Hi *, >> >> >> On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Pid * wrote: >> >>> On 31 Jan 2012, at 10:15, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Not me unfortunately, I hope Lukasz or Maciej could be able to do that. >>> >>> Should we start considering an alternative? I am wincing as I say it, >>> but if we can't make progress on the legal issue then we'll have to >>> take some drastic action. >> >> not to be too pessimistic, but given the current status quo I am starting to >> reconsider what Pid has said. >> >> WDYT? Should we start to think about a fallback plan ? >> >> Regards >> >> Antonio >> >>> >>> >>> p >>> >>> >>> >>>> Tommaso >>>> >>>> 2012/1/31 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> >>>> >>>>> Hi * >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Amber >>>>>> >>>>>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report? >>>>>> >>>>>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from >>>>>> University of Newcastle"? >>>>> >>>>> is there anyone that would be able to give an answer to Jukka (mail sent >>>>> to general@)? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Antonio >> >
