Hi, apologies something got messed up with previous email response template (making the mail hard to read). I try again :)
Hi Raymond On Mar 16, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > Hi, Antonio. > > Thank you for putting together a nice timeline :-). > > So basically, we are stuck at the IP clearance: > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/amber-leeloo.html, right? IIUC correctly yes. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > On Mar 15, 2012, at 7:20 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > >> Hi all, >> to better understand the Leeloo/Newcastle University IP issue I have been >> dug further the mailing list. >> I have thought to share with you my little "chronological report" we can use >> in order to prepare something consistent to ask to legal@ (btw did anybody >> tried to do that for this issue already?): if there is not anything in progress with legal@ I might volunteer to start this thread. Or is there anybody with more legal/process knowledge that wants to do it? Regards Antonio >> >> 10/10 First mention of Leeloo [0] >> 11/10 Introduction of Leeloo to Amber list [1] >> 11/10 Moving Leeloo code to Apache repository [2] >> 12/10 Maciej/Lukasz signed ICLA [3] >> 12/10 IP clearance for Leeloo contribution [4] >> 12/10 AMBER-11/AMBER-12 Leelo donation >> 07/11 IP clearance and first release [5] >> 09/11 Waiting from reply from the University [6] >> 01/12 ASF license and copyrights [7] >> >> >> [0] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201010.mbox/%3C4CA5A544.3040407%40pidster.com%3E >> [1] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTi%3DEp6Df48aFZdB%2BmokAp6HO7-ncmoVdjELKnzwz%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> [2] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTik3xt1H7nOaVGWPUSY9MrkKTPymffd%2BHT7r421A%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> [3] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikCGKnQkGj7wuHnFWoju%3DxbrO0%3DDMYWjkHfS%3DCK%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> [4] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikHhU9gQKAJPtVfXOTrWJQM-XiTkSkBhQpWJfiz%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> [5] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201107.mbox/%3CCAPz8h_XGY5gpMCqVyBxYBJ%2Bg%3DuDCgj-VPttNoKyEb5H4K7JR1w%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> [6] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201109.mbox/%3CCA%2Bc2x_U%3DdtA9UpzpsvbrtNVypcqXEvvq6O8TEGY5D_bLm7ZXRQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E >> [7] >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201201.mbox/%3C4938690A-22C7-4677-8361-735D9A7E939D%40yahoo.com%3E >> >> >> Regards >> >> Antonio >> >> On Mar 14, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Antonio Sanso wrote: >> >>> Hi Simone >>> >>> On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> >>>> Salut a tout le monde, >>>> >>>> didn't we accept external contributions to that part, once Leelo >>>> codebase was accepted? >>>> IIRC issues were filled and patches applied on oauth2, please correct >>>> me if I am wrong! >>>> >>>> As a side note: Leelo's guys submitted Leelo after submitting a >>>> SoftwareGrant, >>> >>> after digging a bit on the mailing list history I am not too sure about >>> that (namely that software grant has been signed). See also [0] >>> Now as a next step, and here I'd ask the help of all, we'd need to collect >>> any information on any document that has been signed, >>> in order to have something specific and precise to ask to legal@ >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>> >>> [0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/e6rhs3tbsydal7i4 >>> >
