Hi Raymond On Mar 12, 2012, at 4:37 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi, Antonio. > > Thank you for driving the efforts. > > Can we run a quick scan of the code base to understand which part of the > source was from Univ. of Newcastle? I think everything under trunk/oauth-2.0 comes from Leeloo hence University of Newcastle. Please correct me if I am wrong. Regards Antonio > > Raymond > > On Mar 12, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > >> Hi *, >> >> as you probably know at this stage seems that we are kind of stuck due this >> IP clearance issue. >> My understanding is also that people might be "afraid" on committing code to >> the current trunk/oauth-2.0 since there is a risk that the contribution >> might be "lost" due IP issues (question: how much "real" is this risk??). >> Taking the risk to be a bit harsh here I'd have the following proposal in >> order to move forward (please do contradict me if you do not agree or have >> any other proposal): >> >> - I'd focus contribution on brand new area/modules avoiding IP related >> issue. >> >> IANAL and I could be totally wrong here so I'll try to articulate my >> proposal with an example. >> AMBER-41 [0] is a brand new topic not implemented in Amber. If I'll create a >> new module e.g. oauth2-resourceserver.mac that leverages other module >> oauth2-resourceserver, oauth2-common we should be "safe". >> Namely if one day we NEED to rewrite oauth2-common from scratch (again this >> is just hypothetical) we can keep oauth2-resourceserver.mac . >> >> WDYT? Apologies again if this sounds kind of pessimistic but I have been >> taught to "hope for the best and plan for the worst" >> >> Regards >> >> Antonio >> >> >> [0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBER-41 >> >> On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Antonio Sanso wrote: >> >>> Hi *, >>> >>> >>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:42 PM, Pid * wrote: >>> >>>> On 31 Jan 2012, at 10:15, Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Not me unfortunately, I hope Lukasz or Maciej could be able to do that. >>>> >>>> Should we start considering an alternative? I am wincing as I say it, >>>> but if we can't make progress on the legal issue then we'll have to >>>> take some drastic action. >>> >>> not to be too pessimistic, but given the current status quo I am starting >>> to reconsider what Pid has said. >>> >>> WDYT? Should we start to think about a fallback plan ? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> p >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Tommaso >>>>> >>>>> 2012/1/31 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi * >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Amber >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from >>>>>>> University of Newcastle"? >>>>>> >>>>>> is there anyone that would be able to give an answer to Jukka (mail sent >>>>>> to general@)? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> Antonio >>> >> >
