Thanks a lot Antonio, fortunately the experience was friend of us this time - before promoting Amber release, Any23 release took something like 3 RCs before to get it right, it was just a matter of learning from past errors :)
Have a nice day, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Simone > On Aug 2, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Hi Antonio, >> >> yes, feel free to update the current pom > > cool, I'll do > >> - I poorly forgot about the >> semantic and let mvn update if for me. >> >> Please apologize and thanks!!! > > no probs. Actually I take another chance to thank you for the great job done > as release manager. > It was one of the smoothest release I have ever seen..... > > Great stuff > > Regards > > Antonio > > >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi *, >>> >>> after the release the current SNAPSHOT version in our poms is >>> >>> 0.23-incubating-SNAPSHOT >>> >>> According to our release semantic I was thinking to change it to be >>> 0.31-incubating-SNAPSHOT (as the version of the spec we are aiming for). >>> >>> WDYT? Should we still keep that naming convention until we will release the >>> 1.0 version or we can continue like this ? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antonio >
