Hi Raymond, in general I kind of agree with you. The Core Oauth specification reached version 31 and should be the last one before being an official RFC .
IMHO we should aim to version 0.31 and try to align to spec and eventually aim for a 1.0 release. Or alternatively we might aim directly to a 1.0 release WDYT? Antonio On Aug 2, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > Hi, > > I start to question if it's a good idea to use the oauth spec version as the > base for Amber. There might be cases that make the scheme not so good: > > 1. What if there are little code changes between two spec versions > 2. What if we need to fix certain things in Amber for a given spec version > 3. What if we implement more specs, such as OpenId connect > > Btw, we can always document which spec level that an amber release implements. > > Thanks, > Raymond > > Sent from my iPad > > On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi *, >> >> after the release the current SNAPSHOT version in our poms is >> >> 0.23-incubating-SNAPSHOT >> >> According to our release semantic I was thinking to change it to be >> 0.31-incubating-SNAPSHOT (as the version of the spec we are aiming for). >> >> WDYT? Should we still keep that naming convention until we will release the >> 1.0 version or we can continue like this ? >> >> Regards >> >> Antonio
