In case of bugfixes you can always decide to release a 0.31.1, 0.31.2 etc. Jasha
On 2 August 2012 17:28, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > > IMHO we should aim to version 0.31 and try to align to spec and > eventually aim for a 1.0 release > > +1, then following the traditional semantic everybody knows and > Raymong suggested. > > best, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Raymond, > > > > in general I kind of agree with you. > > The Core Oauth specification reached version 31 and should be the last > one before being an official RFC . > > > > IMHO we should aim to version 0.31 and try to align to spec and > eventually aim for a 1.0 release. Or alternatively we might aim directly to > a 1.0 release > > > > WDYT? > > > > Antonio > > > > On Aug 2, 2012, at 5:07 PM, Raymond Feng wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I start to question if it's a good idea to use the oauth spec version > as the base for Amber. There might be cases that make the scheme not so > good: > >> > >> 1. What if there are little code changes between two spec versions > >> 2. What if we need to fix certain things in Amber for a given spec > version > >> 3. What if we implement more specs, such as OpenId connect > >> > >> Btw, we can always document which spec level that an amber release > implements. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Raymond > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >> On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:49 AM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi *, > >>> > >>> after the release the current SNAPSHOT version in our poms is > >>> > >>> 0.23-incubating-SNAPSHOT > >>> > >>> According to our release semantic I was thinking to change it to be > 0.31-incubating-SNAPSHOT (as the version of the spec we are aiming for). > >>> > >>> WDYT? Should we still keep that naming convention until we will > release the 1.0 version or we can continue like this ? > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Antonio > > >
