Hi Scott On Dec 7, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
> > On 7 Dec 2012, at 15:05, Antonio Sanso wrote: > >> Hi *, >> >> from the previous discussion it looks enough clear we cannot keep the name >> Amber for the potential Apache TLP. >> Mainly due an existing software project [0]. >> For legal reasons we cannot as well reuse Leeloo as previously explained (no >> CLA signed). > > Still?!? > > Whats the holdup? no hold up anymore :) Just referring to the fact we cannot use Leeloo as a name, as explained from Simone in [0] Regards Antonio [0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/e2gkspbwipnqzua6 > > >> >> So we need a new name. >> Let's the brainstorm begin :) (?) >> >> Regards >> >> Antonio >> >> [0] http://amber-lang.net/ >
