On 8 Dec 2012, at 10:06, Antonio Sanso wrote: > Hi Scott > > On Dec 7, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Scott Wilson wrote: > >> >> On 7 Dec 2012, at 15:05, Antonio Sanso wrote: >> >>> Hi *, >>> >>> from the previous discussion it looks enough clear we cannot keep the name >>> Amber for the potential Apache TLP. >>> Mainly due an existing software project [0]. >>> For legal reasons we cannot as well reuse Leeloo as previously explained >>> (no CLA signed). >> >> Still?!? >> >> Whats the holdup? > > > no hold up anymore :) Just referring to the fact we cannot use Leeloo as a > name, as explained from Simone in [0]
I meant, is there still a requirement for obtaining a CCLA from Newcastle Uni? Or have the team given up chasing it? > > Regards > > Antonio > > [0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/e2gkspbwipnqzua6 > >> >> >>> >>> So we need a new name. >>> Let's the brainstorm begin :) (?) >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>> [0] http://amber-lang.net/ >> >
