Hi .+ there's a wrong information from my last message: for CLA I meant SGA - while NC guys submitted their ICLA, for the software owned by NC University we never received the SGA - that makes Leelo and Amber 2 different project sharing the same initial codebase, then Amber has continued his development lifecycle and released on 2012-07-09
best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Scott > > > On Dec 8, 2012, at 7:49 PM, Scott Wilson wrote: > >> On 8 Dec 2012, at 10:06, Antonio Sanso wrote: >> >>> Hi Scott >>> >>> On Dec 7, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Scott Wilson wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 7 Dec 2012, at 15:05, Antonio Sanso wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi *, >>>>> >>>>> from the previous discussion it looks enough clear we cannot keep the >>>>> name Amber for the potential Apache TLP. >>>>> Mainly due an existing software project [0]. >>>>> For legal reasons we cannot as well reuse Leeloo as previously explained >>>>> (no CLA signed). >>>> >>>> Still?!? >>>> >>>> Whats the holdup? >>> >>> >>> no hold up anymore :) Just referring to the fact we cannot use Leeloo as a >>> name, as explained from Simone in [0] >> >> I meant, is there still a requirement for obtaining a CCLA from Newcastle >> Uni? Or have the team given up chasing it? > > see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-134 > > Regards > > Antonio > >> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>> [0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/e2gkspbwipnqzua6 >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> So we need a new name. >>>>> Let's the brainstorm begin :) (?) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Antonio >>>>> >>>>> [0] http://amber-lang.net/ >>>> >>> >> >
