Re: Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359

[Brian Goetz]

The JEP issue has a sub-task, JVMS for records, which is where the spec 
would be attached.  There is currently no draft there, but we'll post 
one soon.

On 10/4/2019 3:52 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm implementing the support of record (and sealed types) in ASM as an 
experimental (preview if you prefer) feature of the future ASM8.
The JEP 359 [1], doesn't include the bytecode format of the Record attribute, 
is there a reason ?

Rémi
[1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/359