Thank Vicente, I suppose you also have visible and invisible annotations as attribute too ?
Rémi ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Vicente Romero" <vicente.rom...@oracle.com> > À: "Remi Forax" <fo...@univ-mlv.fr>, "amber-spec-experts" > <amber-spec-experts@openjdk.java.net> > Envoyé: Vendredi 4 Octobre 2019 23:33:27 > Objet: Re: Record bytecode format not described in JEP 359 > Hi Remi, > > In the meantime you should be able to access the current definition of > the Record attribute at [1]. > > Thanks, > Vicente > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225058 > > On 10/4/19 3:52 PM, Remi Forax wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> i'm implementing the support of record (and sealed types) in ASM as an >> experimental (preview if you prefer) feature of the future ASM8. >> >> The JEP 359 [1], doesn't include the bytecode format of the Record >> attribute, is >> there a reason ? >> >> Rémi > > [1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/359
