Hi Remi,

In the meantime you should be able to access the current definition of the Record attribute at [1].

Thanks,
Vicente

[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225058

On 10/4/19 3:52 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm implementing the support of record (and sealed types) in ASM as an 
experimental (preview if you prefer) feature of the future ASM8.

The JEP 359 [1], doesn't include the bytecode format of the Record attribute, 
is there a reason ?

Rémi
[1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/359

Reply via email to