Hi Remi,
In the meantime you should be able to access the current definition of
the Record attribute at [1].
Thanks,
Vicente
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8225058
On 10/4/19 3:52 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
Hi everyone,
i'm implementing the support of record (and sealed types) in ASM as an
experimental (preview if you prefer) feature of the future ASM8.
The JEP 359 [1], doesn't include the bytecode format of the Record attribute,
is there a reason ?
Rémi
[1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/359