amber-spec-experts  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Records: supertype? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Records: supertype? Brian Goetz
  • Re: Records: supertype? Tagir Valeev
• Towards better serialization Brian Goetz
  • Re: Towards better serialization Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Towards better serialization Brian Goetz
  • Re: Towards better serialization Brian Goetz
  • Re: Towards better serialization Brian Goetz
  • Re: Towards better serialization forax
  • Re: Towards better serialization Brian Goetz
  • Re: Towards better serialization forax
  • Re: Towards better serialization Brian Goetz
  • Re: Towards better serialization forax
  • Re: Towards better serialization forax
• Looking beyond records: better constructors (and deconstructors) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Looking beyond records: better constructors (and deconstructors) Brian Goetz
• Records and annotations Brian Goetz
  • Re: Records and annotations John Rose
  • Re: Records and annotations Brian Goetz
  • Re: Records and annotations John Rose
  • Re: Records and annotations Kevin Bourrillion
• Text blocks Jim Laskey
• Re: Revisiting field references Remi Forax
  • Re: Revisiting field references Brian Goetz
  • Re: Revisiting field references John Rose
  • Re: Revisiting field references Brian Goetz
• Fwd: Yield as contextual keyword Brian Goetz
• Trailing white-space in text blocks Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Trailing white-space in text blocks James Laskey
  • Re: Trailing white-space in text blocks John Rose
  • Re: Trailing white-space in text blocks John Rose
  • Re: Trailing white-space in text blocks John Rose
• Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Alex Buckley
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Brian Goetz
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Alex Buckley
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Brian Goetz
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Alex Buckley
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Alex Buckley
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Jim Laskey
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Alex Buckley
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Jim Laskey
  • Re: Draft language spec for JEP 355: Text Blocks Alex Buckley
• Draft language spec for JEP354: Switch Expressions Gavin Bierman
• Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Remi Forax
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Guy Steele
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Doug Lea
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Guy Steele
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Doug Lea
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Guy Steele
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Remi Forax
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Alex Buckley
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Guy Steele
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Maurizio Cimadamore
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Guy Steele
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Remi Forax
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Guy Steele
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Alex Buckley
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Remi Forax
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Brian Goetz
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Dan Smith
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch James Laskey
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Remi Forax
  • Re: Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Manoj Palat
  • Re: Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Remi Forax
  • Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Remi Forax
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Guy Steele
  • Re: Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Manoj Palat
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Guy Steele
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Guy Steele
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) John Rose
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Doug Lea
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) John Rose
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) John Rose
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Guy Steele
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Remi Forax
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Dan Smith
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) John Rose
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Alex Buckley
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Dan Smith
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Brian Goetz
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Guy Steele
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Brian Goetz
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Alex Buckley
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword John Rose
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Doug Lea
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Brian Goetz
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Doug Lea
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Peter Levart
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword Alex Buckley
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Brian Goetz
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) John Rose
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Remi Forax
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Guy Steele
  • Re: Yield as contextual keyword (was: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch) Tagir Valeev
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Alex Buckley
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Alex Buckley
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch John Rose
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Remi Forax
  • Re: Call for bikeshed -- break replacement in expression switch Doug Lea
• Long line string literals Jim Laskey
  • Re: Long line string literals John Rose
• RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Jim Laskey
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Jim Laskey
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Jim Laskey
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Brian Goetz
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] John Rose
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Alex Buckley
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Dan Smith
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Tagir Valeev
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Jim Laskey
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Guy Steele
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Jim Laskey
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Guy Steele
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Brian Goetz
  • Re: RFR: Multi-line String Literal (Preview) JEP [EG Draft] Guy Steele
• Feedback on Sealed Types Alan Malloy
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types Remi Forax
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types forax
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types forax
  • Re: Feedback on Sealed Types John Rose
• String literals: some principles Brian Goetz
  • Re: String literals: some principles Guy Steele
  • Re: String literals: some principles John Rose
  • Re: String literals: some principles Guy Steele
  • Re: String literals: some principles John Rose
  • Re: String literals: some principles John Rose
  • [ string literals ] Extending the escape language (was: String literals: some principles) Brian Goetz
  • Re: [ string literals ] Extending the escape language (was: String literals: some principles) John Rose
  • Re: [ string literals ] Extending the escape language (was: String literals: some principles) Guy Steele
  • Re: [ string literals ] Extending the escape language (was: String literals: some principles) John Rose
  • Re: [ string literals ] Extending the escape language (was: String literals: some principles) Guy Steele
  • Re: [ string literals ] Extending the escape language (was: String literals: some principles) James Laskey
  • Re: [ string literals ] Extending the escape language (was: String literals: some principles) Guy Steele
  • Re: [ string literals ] Extending the escape language (was: String literals: some principles) John Rose
• Fwd: String reboot proposal Brian Goetz
• Revised semantics for break within switch expression Gavin Bierman
  • Re: Revised semantics for break within switch expression John Rose
  • Re: Revised semantics for break within switch expression Brian Goetz
• A library for implementing equals and hashCode Liam Miller-Cushon
  • Re: A library for implementing equals and hashCode Remi Forax
  • Re: A library for implementing equals and hashCode Stuart Marks
  • Re: A library for implementing equals and hashCode Stuart Marks
  • Re: A library for implementing equals and hashCode Stuart Marks
  • Re: A library for implementing equals and hashCode Kevin Bourrillion
  • Re: A library for implementing equals and hashCode John Rose
  • Re: A library for implementing equals and hashCode Brian Goetz
  • Re: A library for implementing equals and hashCode Remi Forax
• Draft JEP on records and sealed types Brian Goetz
  • Re: Draft JEP on records and sealed types Remi Forax
  • Re: Draft JEP on records and sealed types Brian Goetz
• To align, or not to align? Brian Goetz
  • Re: To align, or not to align? Guy Steele
  • Re: To align, or not to align? Brian Goetz
  • Re: To align, or not to align? Kevin Bourrillion
  • Re: To align, or not to align? John Rose
  • Re: To align, or not to align? Brian Goetz
  • Re: To align, or not to align? John Rose

• Earlier messages
• Later messages