I have noticed last few weeks a growing number of tickers that don't download 
in yahoo current and need to be downloaded in yahoo historic. For example, out 
of 645 ETFs, 150 or so will not download in yahoo current after the market has 
been open one hour this morning. Some of these are low volume, infrequently 
traded tickers. But in past this was only a handleful, maybe 10-20 or so. Now, 
tt seems to be tickers that trade up to a few thousand, but they are trading 
and just not being reported. They will report EOD, Yahoo Historic later.

I'm sure it will change again. That's Yahoo.
Dave


----- Original Message ----- 
  From: wavemechanic 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 4:54 AM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] Yahoo Current Backfill , many N/A on active stocks



  It sounds like you are attempting to download from the Yahoo Current (Daily) 
server after it has been reset for the next day (reset time might not be 
constant).  If so, you have to use historical data which in your case (late at 
night) will always work.

  Bill
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Homar Simpson 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 1:11 AM
    Subject: [amibroker] Yahoo Current Backfill , many N/A on active stocks


    Lately I'm getting large numbers of symbols coming up N/A on the
    Daily  update (done late at night).

      The data is present in the historical download.

      Does Yahoo just stink?


    ------------------------------------

    Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

    To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
    SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

    For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
    http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/

    For other support material please check also:
    http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
    Yahoo! Groups Links





    -- 
    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG. 
    Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.9/1416 - Release Date: 5/5/2008 
5:11 PM



   

Reply via email to