You bet there is a copyright on them.  Once someone publishes a review of a 
book in any format, i.e, print, electronic, they own the copyright to those 
words that they wrote.  

Try and take some of the "public domain" information and sell it as your own 
and you'll soon find out they are NOT in the public domain for that.  You can 
buy the book, set up the formulas and follow them to your financial ruin or 
remineration but they are STILL copyrighted works.

Judith

________________________________
From: Michel Guibert <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 3:25:59 PM
Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT


If I follow all the copyright , I can't do anything , everybody has done 
everything before me.
Many formulas were published in many books or review and you think there is 
copyright on them  ???
Personnaly when they are published in a review I consider them in the public 
domain.
 
MG



________________________________

To: amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com
From: ohnec...@yahoo. com
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:05:28 -0800
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT



Whenever you write something, you own the copyright to it such -- even these 
posts are the IP of the individual poster and they own the copyright to the 
contents.  Yahoo does not own it, the group owner does not own it and in 
the Yahoo TOS, this is so stated.

In another group that suffers from overt estrogen overloaded, 1 person wrote a 
guide, lifted whole posts of other members and put them in her guide (without 
credit or permission) that she sold and was called on it.  The person who was 
charging for the information had to refund money and revise her guide to be 
strictly and exclusively her own words.  That is an example of copyright 
violation.

I use and quote George C Lane and his application of the stochastic formula all 
the time and it is NOT a violation of copyright because the settings are mine 
that I have played around with, I give credit where I have learned something 
from someone else such as David Elliott about stochastics settings, etc., and 
don't lift entire paragraphs or words in the same series as their works.  These 
are not copyright violations.  These come under the fair and free use concept.

If I am discussing something from a trading book or manual that is copyrighted  
and put it into my own words even though it is not my original idea, that is 
not a violation of copyright.  

If I write a book or prepare a PP presentation and pass the work off as my own 
when it is based on someone else's work and the charts are THEIRS I lifted 
entirely, word for word or exactly the same indicator settings, other than my 
own stochastic settings I've developed, and sell it, that is a violation of 
copyright.  

The two elements are:  passing stuff off as your own when you copied it from 
someone else and selling it as your own idea.

Judith




________________________________
From: Barry Scarborough <razzba...@imageview .us>
To: amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 10:32:28 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT


No. It appears there is a lot of confusion on copyright laws. A good 
discussion is at http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Copyrights. OF course 
this isn't official but it is an easier read than the law books. 
People like Wilder published his works so others could benefit from 
his discoveries. What the copyright laws do is prevent someone from 
copying his work and selling it. But the intellectual property he 
disclosed is for our use. Why else would he publish it?

Barry

--- In amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com, "binjobingo" <binjobingo@ ...> wrote:
>
> Does referring to Wilder's Relative strength Indicator,or Lane's
> Stochastics, or Chande's Vidya & so on lead to copyright violation?
> 
> Say one reads An Author's book & am not able to write AFL for the
> Indicators & so ask the forum members to write it for me Is it
> copyright violation?
> 
> If one give a link to the Website say some other website which
> explains the parameters & use of the said "indicator" but the 
website
> may not be owned by the Author himself does it lead to copyright
> violation ?
> 
> If it is so I think all the forums would close down & nobody would
> discuss their trading strategy since trading strategies use some
> Indicator by some author.
>





________________________________
Win a trip with your 3 best buddies. Enter today.  


      

Reply via email to