> But what do I know. Quite a bit judging ny your posts ;-)
--- In [email protected], ohneclue <ohnec...@...> wrote: > > Stochastics is basically a mathematical differential equation used in all kinds of industries to do all kinds of things. It is not unique to the TA in the stock market analysis. > > If Lane bought him out, that was the ethical thing to do. But I always see everyone saying George C Lane is the originator of the stochastsics used for TA of stocks rather than he worked for someone and bought him out. That could be true, I just don't see any reference to that when I Google him. > > But what do I know. > > Judith > > ________________________________ > From: MAVIRK <mvir...@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 12:13:15 AM > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT > > > And the problem keeps on getting compounded . > > > From: LB > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 5:17 AM > To: amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT > > > And of course Lane didn't come up with Stochastics. It was the man Lane was working for and Lane later bought him out. > Lane I believe though was the one who smoothed the stochastics. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: MAVIRK > To: amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com > Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2008 11:42 PM > Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT > > Can one use Stoch's with Mr. Lanes' Sefault Setting? > > > From: Barry Scarborough > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 6:48 AM > To: amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com > Subject: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT > > No, that is not correct. If someone publishes a formula and you > optimize it and come up with different periods or apply it in a > different way that is your work. > > Let me use an example to show the subtlety of this. Every car has an > engine and transmission. Every different variation has a different > patent. There may be only a small variation but you would not have to > pry royalties on the new variation. You can do two things, publish it > or patent it. Once you do either then the work you did is in the > public domain and no one else can patent your work. > > Barry > > --- In amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com, Michel Guibert <michelg14@ ..> > wrote: > > > > > > If I follow all the copyright , I can't do anything , everybody has > done everything before me. > > Many formulas were published in many books or review and you think > there is copyright on them ??? > > Personnaly when they are published in a review I consider them in > the public domain. > > > > MG > > > > > > > > To: amibroker@ .: ohneclue@ : Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:05:28 - > 0800Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT > > > > > > > > > > > > Whenever you write something, you own the copyright to it such -- > even these posts are the IP of the individual poster and they own the > copyright to the contents. Yahoo does not own it, the group owner > does not own it and in the Yahoo TOS, this is so stated. > > > > In another group that suffers from overt estrogen overloaded, 1 > person wrote a guide, lifted whole posts of other members and put > them in her guide (without credit or permission) that she sold and > was called on it. The person who was charging for the information > had to refund money and revise her guide to be strictly and > exclusively her own words. That is an example of copyright violation. > > > > I use and quote George C Lane and his application of the stochastic > formula all the time and it is NOT a violation of copyright because > the settings are mine that I have played around with, I give credit > where I have learned something from someone else such as David > Elliott about stochastics settings, etc., and don't lift entire > paragraphs or words in the same series as their works. These are not > copyright violations. These come under the fair and free use concept. > > > > If I am discussing something from a trading book or manual that is > copyrighted and put it into my own words even though it is not my > original idea, that is not a violation of copyright. > > > > If I write a book or prepare a PP presentation and pass the work > off as my own when it is based on someone else's work and the charts > are THEIRS I lifted entirely, word for word or exactly the same > indicator settings, other than my own stochastic settings I've > developed, and sell it, that is a violation of copyright. > > > > The two elements are: passing stuff off as your own when you > copied it from someone else and selling it as your own idea. > > > > Judith > > > > > > > > From: Barry Scarborough <razzbarry@ ..>To: amibroker@ .: Friday, > December 19, 2008 10:32:28 PMSubject: [amibroker] Re: COPYRIGHT > > > > No. It appears there is a lot of confusion on copyright laws. A > good discussion is at http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Copyrights. OF > course this isn't official but it is an easier read than the law > books. People like Wilder published his works so others could benefit > from his discoveries. What the copyright laws do is prevent someone > from copying his work and selling it. But the intellectual property > he disclosed is for our use. Why else would he publish it?Barry--- In > amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com, "binjobingo" <binjobingo@ ...> wrote:>> > Does referring to Wilder's Relative strength Indicator,or Lane's> > Stochastics, or Chande's Vidya & so on lead to copyright violation? > > > Say one reads An Author's book & am not able to write AFL for the> > Indicators & so ask the forum members to write it for me Is it> > copyright violation?> > If one give a link to the Website say some > other website which> explains the parameters & use of the > said "indicator" but the website> may not be owned by the Author > himself does it lead to copyright> violation ?> > If it is so I think > all the forums would close down & nobody would> discuss their trading > strategy since trading strategies use some> Indicator by some author.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _ > > Drag n' dropGet easy photo sharing with Windows Live Photos. > > http://www.microsof t.com/windows/ windowslive/ photos.aspx > > >
