> That might hinge on what you mean by "very advanced". I'm only the facilitator ... groups should make their own decisions about definitions and modus operandi :-)
Group trading could be very rewarding for those who can manage it ... personally and financially it should benefit certain types. --- In [email protected], "progster01" <progs...@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote: > > > > Distributing signals, processing etc amongst a group of traders, > > geographically dispersed, would require a very advanced group dynamic. > > That might hinge on what you mean by "very advanced". > > It is currently possible for retail traders to license and operate for a > few hundred dollars software that automatically applies a very > sophisticated rule-base to symbols/sectors of choice, searches > automatically for and continuously improves systems according to the > trader's own definition of "good", optionally generates daily signal > emails, and sends them to whomever you designate. > > Hence, a simple agreement by two or more traders to run this software, > keep up with the minimal necessary human setup/maintenance, and copy > each other on the signal emails is all that is required. > > Of course, one might say getting even this much agreement would > constitute a "very advanced group dynamic" for typical traders ... <g> > > (The specifics of this are off-topic here, but anyone who wants to know > more is welcome to contact me directly.) >
