The rule was 2000 W PEP INPUT.

73,  Jack, W9GT

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Jim Wilhite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

> John, are we allowed use of 40 meters on a secondary basis? Wasn't this one 
> of the reasons the FCC under Johnson reduced output power to 1500 PEP rather 
> than 2 KW PEP. That showed the overseas broadcasters we were cooperating. 
> 
> I know many years ago they complained mightily about the hams in Region 2 
> were over riding the broadcast stations. 
> 
> 73 Jim 
> W5JO 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Coleman ARS WA5BXO" 
> To: ; "'Discussion of AM Radio'" 
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:25 AM 
> Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306 
> 
> 
> > Just get on 40 meters and consider it a challenge to communicate over 
> > the broadcasting stations. You have as mush right to be there as them. 
> > Start up talking to you neighbor running as much as you can to a low 
> > angle radiator. Be sure your not zero beat. Don't think for a minute 
> > that the heterodyne you cause won't be heard over seas. That should 
> > start an inquiry. Then again, they would probably just take 40 meters 
> > away from us. 
> > 
> > John, 
> > WA5BXO 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________ 
> AMRadio mailing list 
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio 
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html 
> Post: mailto:[email protected] 
> AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net 
> AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb 
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Jan 17 12:13:49 2006
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
        by mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2711859C10
        for <[email protected]>; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:13:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from your1rnfg39627
        (c-71-57-149-211.hsd1.fl.comcast.net[71.57.149.211])
        by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
        id <2006011717084001100ddp7le>; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:08:40 +0000
From: "Gary Schafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Discussion of AM Radio'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:08:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thread-Index: AcYbdpn5JIqUc2PbSpawS1TdSFm0iQAEeW+w
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        Discussion of AM Radio <[email protected]>
List-Id: Discussion of AM Radio <amradio.mailman.qth.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/private/amradio>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:13:49 -0000

Never was any 2000 W PEP input. It was only 1000 watts AVARAGE input.

73
Gary  K4FMX

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:59 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306

The rule was 2000 W PEP INPUT.

73,  Jack, W9GT

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Jim Wilhite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

> John, are we allowed use of 40 meters on a secondary basis? Wasn't this
one 
> of the reasons the FCC under Johnson reduced output power to 1500 PEP
rather 
> than 2 KW PEP. That showed the overseas broadcasters we were cooperating. 
> 
> I know many years ago they complained mightily about the hams in Region 2 
> were over riding the broadcast stations. 
> 
> 73 Jim 
> W5JO 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Coleman ARS WA5BXO" 
> To: ; "'Discussion of AM Radio'" 
> 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:25 AM 
> Subject: RE: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306 
> 
> 
> > Just get on 40 meters and consider it a challenge to communicate over 
> > the broadcasting stations. You have as mush right to be there as them. 
> > Start up talking to you neighbor running as much as you can to a low 
> > angle radiator. Be sure your not zero beat. Don't think for a minute 
> > that the heterodyne you cause won't be heard over seas. That should 
> > start an inquiry. Then again, they would probably just take 40 meters 
> > away from us. 
> > 
> > John, 
> > WA5BXO 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________ 
> AMRadio mailing list 
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio 
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html 
> Post: mailto:[email protected] 
> AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net 
> AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb 
______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:[email protected]
AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb


Reply via email to