Isn't this the kind of behavior that should be discouraged? I have and
"issue" with some SSB operators on a frequency where I operated SSB. Should
I behave as this guy has?
I wonder if the ARRL should form a committee to help resolve these problems.
It might be a good way to prevent them from escalating to interference
problems and resultant complaints to the FCC.
We are in a low sunspot cycle currently and interference and resultant
confrontations are commonplace. What has not changed is the attitude of
this guy when it comes to a legal mode operated in a technically correct
manner. He should have to answer and should have his license removed if he
cannot accept the overall rules he agreed to follow when he accepted his
license.
73 Jim
W5JO
----- Original Message -----
From: "peter markavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Why the League Petition would be BAD for AM
I think Ron believes all AM'ers should stay in the imaginary AM window
and not wander around all over 75 meters. You should strike up an e-mail
dialogue with him to find out where he's really coming from. Maybe he
just doesn't like you or has had an issue with AM (or AM'ers) in the past
that keeps gnawing at him. i.e. the itch you can't reach.
Pete, wa2cwa
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:50:57 -0500 "W1EOF" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: VJB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 4:28 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [AMRadio] Why the League Petition would be BAD for AM
<SNIP>
> I've already had one heckler,
> N2NGY, breaking into a QSO on 75m and telling us that
> your Petition will "finally do us in."
<SNIP>
> Paul
I'm not diagreeing with you but consider the source
Paul (See below, from the ARRL website) -
73,
Mark W1EOF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NJ: The FCC sent a Warning Notice March 14, 2000,
to
Advanced licensee Ronald Marshott, N2NGY, to advise him that
information
before the Commission indicates the licensee has been "deliberately
interfering with the radio operations of other licensed amateurs on
the
75-meter band." The FCC also said it has information that the
licensee
"failed to identify, identified by call signs not your own, and have
made
threats to other licensees." FCC Special Counsel for Amateur Radio
Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth warned Marshott that operation of
the type
described "will not be tolerated" and could result in a fine and
revocation
proceedings. Hollingsworth requested the licensee contact him to
discuss the
matter.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
January 15, 2002
Mr. Ronald Marshott
56 Briarwood Drive West
Berkely Heights, NJ 07922
RE: Warning Notice: Amateur Radio license N2NGY
Dear Mr. Marshott:
Monitoring information before the Commission indicates that you
were
transmitting music during transmission on 3.832 MHz on the evening
of
November 27, 2001.
Please be advised that such transmissions are contrary to the
Commission's
rules regarding the Amateur Radio Service, and degrade the Service
for
legitimate users. You are requested to review the Commission's rules
for the
Amateur Service, particularly Section 97.113(a)(4).
You may call me at 717-338-2502 if you have any questions about this
matter.
______________________________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:[email protected]
AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb
