To: [email protected] Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:35:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Why the League Petition would be BAD for AM From: "peter markavage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert Bob said: "ARRL will not want to enforce it through the Official Observer program because of legal liability."
It might be helpful if you could explain what "legal liability" you are referring to. Pete, wa2cwa On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:24:24 -0800 (PST) Bob Scupp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306 > I agree with you! Based on historical retrospect, the FCC will not possess the budgetary means to enforce it also. The ARRL will not want to enforce it > through the Official Observer program because of legal liability. Therefore, the entire Amateur Radio community will have to respond to it. Sorry, but I > do no think that will happen either or will be far and few between and totally ineffective! > "Just the fact ma'am and only the facts!", as they say on Dragnet. > > Thanks for your and everyone else's comments. > > 73's, > Bob K5SEP ______________________________________________________________ AMRadio mailing list Pete and All- I was speaking of legal action such as law suits against ARRL or any of it's representatives acting in their capacity. This happening after the League Petition goes through the NPRM stage and is unmodified(?) and is included in a revised Part 97. Sorry I did not clarify that point. I really hope I am wrong on this one though. Thank you for asking. 73's, Bob K5SEP Life Member QCWA and ARRL Member - Antique Wireless Association Life Member - New Mexico Radio Collectors Club __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
