Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:06:14 -0800 (PST) From: "Bob Scupp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Web page appears in opposition to RM-11306 To: [email protected] CC: "Brian Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"The exact same thing can be said of the ARRL proposal. The only difference is that the ARRL proposal hampers everyone with a lot more complicated rules and hampers the FCC with enforcing something they don't have time to monitor." Brian- I agree with you! Based on historical retrospect, the FCC will not possess the budgetary means to enforce it also. The ARRL will not want to enforce it through the Official Observer program because of legal liability. Therefore, the entire Amateur Radio community will have to respond to it. Sorry, but I do no think that will happen either or will be far and few between and totally ineffective! "Just the fact ma'am and only the facts!", as they say on Dragnet. Thanks for your and everyone else's comments. 73's, Bob K5SEP "The ARRL will not want to enforce it through the Official Observer program because of legal liability. Therefore, the entire Amateur Radio community will have to respond to it. Sorry, but I do no think that will happen either or will be far and few between and totally ineffective!" The same goes for any other committee/service the League might consider. (Unfortunately) 73's, Bob K5SEP Life Member QCWA and ARRL Member - Antique Wireless Association Life Member - New Mexico Radio Collectors Club __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
