On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, Stephen Turner wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Jeremy Wadsack wrote:
> >
> > Then again, all the browsers build CGI strings by separateing the
> > variables with an '&' and the "HTML people" (RFC 1833, I think) stand by
> > their recommendation that this should be something different like ';'.
>
> No, 1833 is "Binding Protocols for ONC RPC Version 2" :) You mean RFC 1866,
> which is HTML 2.0. It says that they are encoded with '&' (Section 8.2.1).
> It does say that in order to put them safely into URLs, ';' should also be
> supported. However, HTML 4.0 seems to drop this second part.
You must not have made it all the way to the appendix, then. :)
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/appendix/notes.html#h-B.2.2
-adam
--
/ adam maccabee trachtenberg | visit college life online \
\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.student.com /
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe analog-help" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
