Stephen Turner wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So I wanted to get rid of them:
> >
> > FROM 990000
> > TO 001231
> >
> > and unfortunately ended up with a filename (using OUTFILE
> > webs2-%m-%Dat%H.html) like this:
> >
> > webs2-Dec-31at23.html
> >
> > instead of today's date...
>
> Well... not really, as it's deliberate. Think of a normal TO command which
> chooses some period in the past. It's not completely clear what the right
> naming for the output file is, but I'm inclined to think that it should be
> named after the end of the period being analysed, not after the time the
> report was run. (This is also as documented). Unless everyone else
> disagrees?
Well, I've never wanted the output filename to be the current date unless the
time period also ends on the current day. So my vote is to keep it the way it
implemented now.
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
