On Fri, 12 May 2000, Aengus Lawlor wrote:
>
> I remember discussing whether "Time taken" is recorded in milliseconds
> or seconds, and deciding that Microsoft was technically incorrect in
> using milliseconds, but from a practical point of view, that
> milliseconds made a lot more sense than seconds. Are there other
> differences?
>
Of course milliseconds is a much more sensible granularity, but the W3 spec
allows decimals so they should use 1.234 s not 1234 ms. Yes, there are other
differences -- see the analog docs for a list.
--
Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences,
Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WB, England
"8th March 2000. National No Smoking Day. Ash Wednesday." (On a calendar)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
