On Mon, 15 May 2000, Aengus Lawlor wrote:
>
> To be fair, it's a Working Draft, not a spec.
Oh, I agree. But that's no reason to ignore it without a reason.
> It's a pity Microsoft didn't document why the ignored the draft (the use
> of milliseconds ... are improvements, in my opinion).
I disagree here. Putting everything in seconds with decimals allows
different servers to choose different granularities. One can log in
milliseconds, one in centiseconds, and one in seconds, if they want.
> It
> might have triggered a move to finally upgrade the 4 year old draft to a
> standard.
>
I think there was a conscious decision to abandon it. It never really got
very far. I remember reading it when it first came out, and I was a bit
surprised when server vendors started implementing it a while after it
looked dead in the water.
> By the way, I remeber the question being asked when this came up before,
> but I don't remember the answer. Does Apache log Time Taken in
> milliseconds?
>
No. I think this comes up on the newsgroup about once a week, but I don't
know if anyone's listening.
--
Stephen Turner http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~sret1/
Statistical Laboratory, Centre for Mathematical Sciences,
Wilberforce Road, Cambridge, CB3 0WB, England
"8th March 2000. National No Smoking Day. Ash Wednesday." (On a calendar)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
mailing list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe" in the main BODY OF THE MESSAGE.
List archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
