Fragy wrote:
> Thank you for your answer, but I think I haven't stated my problem well.
>
> The problem is that the Cache engine keeps a Log of its own transactions
> like the server does. Every transaction served by the Cache engine is
> reported as HIT and everything else as MISS in its Log. The missed requests
> are passed to the server, which Logs the transaction with the Cache Engine's
> IP as a refferer.
> So a request can be logged at the Cache engine as Missed and also
> logged at the Server's Logfile.
> If I analyse the Server's Log, I miss the refferers (since it sees the
> IP of the Cache engine in up to 90% of the requests), and also the requests
> served by the Cache engine.
> My thought was to count the HITs of the Cache engine (where I have a
> clear image of the number of transactions and the refferer info), and then
> analyse the Server's Log excluding all the lines reffering to the Cache
> engine.
> Do you think that this would give me good results?
Yes. This should work.
--
Jeremy Wadsack
Wadsack-Allen Digital Group
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
| mailing list, go to
| http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
|
| List archives are available at
| http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
| http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
| http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
