On Wed 02 May 2001 16:16, you wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2001, Claudiu Costin wrote:
> > So, I see this is a gently "Sorry, I don't want to
> > implement this feature". Or I'm wrong?
>
> Not "I don't want to" so much as "this would make analog use much more
> memory and run much slower".
Sorry I don't know analog internals, but in main processing loop
(I think it have something like this) you can test a config file
flag an skip IP grabbing function if it is not set. So, it's
user concern if he has memory to spent. IP list can be write on
disk and not keep in memory. Thinking to very active sites with
houndreds of thousand of visitors is not fesible at all even with
normal statistics grabbing.
Again, IP counting per day, per week etc is very demanding. An
PR person don't care about how nice graphs are, but very compact
numbers which can be an overview of site traffic. At least
on my country this is ranking method. Anybody on this list
can tell me how on his location is traffic quantified?
P.S. Thanks for yor patience
kind regards,
--
Claudiu Costin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
| This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
| mailing list, go to
| http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
|
| List archives are available at
| http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
| http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
| http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
