On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Klaus Johannes Rusch wrote:
> 
> I see how UNCOMPRESS can be used as a pre-processing hook, however adding
> additional filters means modifying all UNCOMPRESS directives (and creating
> new UNCOMPRESS directives for all extensions that aren't really compressed).
> 
> An explicit PROPROCESSFILTER statement would be much easier to use without
> "breaking" the nicely working UNCOMPRESS 
> 

So really you want two preprocessors, the regular uncompress and a new one.
You can do this by writing a simple script that passes the file through
whichever filters you want, and calling that script as the argument to the
UNCOMPRESS.

-- 
Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK    http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/
"This is Henman's 8th Wimbledon, and he's only lost 7 matches." BBC, 2/Jul/01

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  This is the analog-help mailing list. To unsubscribe from this
|  mailing list, go to
|    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html
|
|  List archives are available at
|    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
|    http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/archives/
|    http://www.tallylist.com/archives/index.cfm/mlist.7
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to