I routinely run several analog reports. I recently modified the configuration files to include a much larger number (~4000, instead of ~200) of HOSTALIAS commands.
After this, it seems that analog performance has degraded by a factor of 20. Can anyone provide any insight? Background details: Our logfiles have IP addresses in. The HOSTALIAS commands are like: HOSTALIAS 122.232.*.* HOSTA HOSTALIAS 122.36.240.83 HOSTB HOSTALIAS 122.34.170.128 HOSTC HOSTALIAS 122.34.170.129 HOSTC HOSTALIAS 122.34.170.130 HOSTC HOSTALIAS 122.34.170.131 HOSTC HOSTALIAS 122.34.170.132 HOSTC HOSTALIAS 122.34.170.133 HOSTC etc... (ip and hostnames changed, but note that there are consecutive number ranges for a set of ip addresses to map to a single host alias). Thanks, Adrian Adrian Dolling, Systems Consultant Public Library Services Branch Ministry of Community, Aboriginal and Women's Services PO Box 9490 Stn Prov Govt (mailing address) Victoria BC V8W 9N7 800 Johnson St, Victoria, BC (street address) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (New EMail December 2002) www.mcaws.gov.bc.ca/LGD/public_libraries/ <www.mcaws.gov.bc.ca/LGD/public_libraries/> Tel 250-387-4043 or 1-800-663-7051 FAX 250-953-3225 +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
