On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Paul Reiff wrote: > > Hi Stephen, thanks for your quick answer (from the master himself....;-), > but after testing it with the way you recommended, i got the impression that > sth. went wrong. > It seems, that when i include all the old cachfiles there occurs > 'multible-counting', because the cachefile from yesterday includes the data > from day before yesterday (and so on) and analog doesn't seem to realize > that. I can see that by the fact, that the overall number of hits calculated > in the final logfile of the month exceeds the total number of entrys > significantly.... > Do you have an idea what went wrong ? >
Yes. You didn't do it the way I suggested in the docs. I recommend never making a new cache file from old cache files. Just make the new cache file from the newly-rotated logfile, so there is one cache file per logfile, and none of them overlap. Then analyse all the little cache files. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim." (Edsger W. Dijkstra) +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
