On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Paul Reiff wrote: > > Oh, i thought if i pass both, a logfile and an old cachefile and creating a > report and a new cache file simultaneuosly, the resulting cache file would > only refer to the logfile, ignoring the data from the old cachefiles.
No, this is not the case. If you do that the new cache file gets data from the old cache files too, and bad things happen. > So creating the cachefile and creating the report should be two separate > runs of analog ?!? > Right. Of course, creating the report will be quick because you're just reading cache files, not the logfile. -- Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim." (Edsger W. Dijkstra) +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
