----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "analog Mailing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [analog-help] Incremental Processing
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Paul Reiff wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen, thanks for your quick answer (from the master himself....;-), > > but after testing it with the way you recommended, i got the impression that > > sth. went wrong. > > It seems, that when i include all the old cachfiles there occurs > > 'multible-counting', because the cachefile from yesterday includes the data > > from day before yesterday (and so on) and analog doesn't seem to realize > > that. I can see that by the fact, that the overall number of hits calculated > > in the final logfile of the month exceeds the total number of entrys > > significantly.... > > Do you have an idea what went wrong ? > > > > Yes. You didn't do it the way I suggested in the docs. I recommend never > making a new cache file from old cache files. Just make the new cache file > from the newly-rotated logfile, so there is one cache file per logfile, and > none of them overlap. Then analyse all the little cache files. > > -- > Stephen Turner, Cambridge, UK http://homepage.ntlworld.com/adelie/stephen/ > "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than > the question of whether a submarine can swim." (Edsger W. Dijkstra) > +------------------------------------------------------------------------ > | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: > | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html > | > | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ > | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general > | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives > +------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Oh, i thought if i pass both, a logfile and an old cachefile and creating a report and a new cache file simultaneuosly, the resulting cache file would only refer to the logfile, ignoring the data from the old cachefiles. So creating the cachefile and creating the report should be two separate runs of analog ?!? +------------------------------------------------------------------------ | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: | http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help/unsubscribe.html | | Digest version: http://lists.isite.net/listgate/analog-help-digest/ | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +------------------------------------------------------------------------
