Makes sense to me.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Neil P. Quinn <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Keep in mind that, when I say "metrics documentation", I'm not referring
> to documentation about Hive
> <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Cluster/Hive>, the webrequest
> logs <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/Data/Webrequest>, or
> EventLogging <https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Analytics/EventLogging>.
> To my mind, those are infrastructure topics that are relevant mainly to
> Wikimedia (not MediaWiki) engineers, and so belong on Wikitech.
>
> I'm talking about documentation relevant to analysts, researchers, and end
> users of metrics: "this is how we define an *edit*", "this is why we use
> 5 edits as the cutoff for an active editor", "this is sample SQL for
> counting surviving new active editors", and so on. I think that kind of
> information belongs on Meta (and not on mediawiki.org, which was the
> original thrust of my question).
>
> Does that seem like a sensible split to people, or am I just agreeing with
> one side of the debate?
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Aaron Halfaker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I think having documentation in more than one place is an awful
>>> experience for newcomers.
>>
>>
>> Which newcomers are you referring to?  Newcomers to the WMF engineering
>> staff or newcomers to research/analytics of Wikimedia projects?
>>
>> It's OK to not understand the different purposes of our Wikis right away,
>> but I don't think that is a good reason to undermine their purposes.  I
>> certainly don't see why wikitech is a desirable hub for this kind of
>> information.  From my point of view Wikitech is the *worst* potential hub
>> of information that is not specific to engineering.
>>
>> What, exactly, is the trouble with having metrics documentation on Meta?
>>   How would moving *some of the the documentation* to wikitech help that?
>> (Because you're not going to move research project documentation without
>> even stronger disagreement from the locals.)
>>
>> -Aaron
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Strongly oppose moving the Research namespace hosted metrics
>>>> documentation off Meta. It's s'posed to be broadly accessible. Wikitech is
>>>> on few peoples' radar. Mediawiki.org is for software documentation. Meta is
>>>> the central wiki for the movement (however imperfect). - J
>>>>
>>>
>>> I respect the fact that these kinds of distinctions make sense to people
>>> who are already familiar with the movement and research / analytics.  But
>>> to someone relatively new, and to me for the first year at the foundation,
>>> those distinctions made zero sense.
>>>
>>> I'm not saying it's easy, but I think having documentation in more than
>>> one place is an awful experience for newcomers.  We'll continue to move
>>> things to wikitech and leave nice high level landing pages on the other
>>> wikis.  Others are welcome to act differently if they so see fit.  I know a
>>> lot of research stuff is on meta, so maybe in your case it makes sense to
>>> standardize on meta and point to it from the other wikis.
>>>
>>> You're of course welcome to disagree with me but I'd suggest first
>>> trying to come up with examples of newcomers who understand the purpose of
>>> our different wikis perfectly right away.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Analytics mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Analytics mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Neil P. Quinn <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Neil_P._Quinn-WMF>,
> product analyst
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> Analytics mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
>
>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to