I've always thought that blanking the page and replacing it with a template which says it's historical and *links* to the historical version of the page would be a good solution that balances preserving history with deemphasizing outdated information.
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have a documentation cleanup day coming up soon, and we've just got >> > delete permissions so we can actually clean. >> >> Please don't delete old content, mark it as {{historical}} or >> {{outdated}} and archive it instead. >> > > I'm all for following the norm here, but wouldn't that mean it still shows > up in searches? That's what I'm trying to avoid, minimizing the confusion. > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > -- Neil P. Quinn <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Neil_P._Quinn-WMF>, product analyst Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
