Trying again, adding analytics@ (public e-mail list)

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I also think we should start with exposing the 3 api's endpoints in a GUI,
> which - as Dan says - we know respond to community interests. And then ask
> the community for more input, that could mean improvements to the tool, new
> endpoints or completely new ideas...
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm ok if people want to take an iterative approach, I just want to point
>> out that the usage information is not very indicative of value at this
>> point.  The API is not widely used and the per-article endpoint is expected
>> to be hit much much more than per-project or top simply because the queries
>> are many orders of magnitude more granular.  So we can't really judge
>> importance from that comparison.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Leila Zia <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> My question is: How are we going to define the requirements for the
>>>>> tool? I was planning to get some community input on defining which stats
>>>>> would help contributors the most. What do you think?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My opinion here is that we should just expose everything the pageview
>>>> API is capable of.  It's only 3 different end points and they were chosen
>>>> based on what the community found useful.  As we add more endpoints we can
>>>> keep checking if visualization is important.  But of course if others have
>>>> other more specific plans, we can wait for those tools to be built and
>>>> iterate.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ​Building up on Dan's suggestion: I'd go with communicating and/or
>>> discussing the following with the community:
>>>
>>> * the 3 different metrics we can offer a UI for
>>> * what other metrics they find useful for their work. This will help us
>>> collect information about what other kind of metrics we should offer as an
>>> end-point if we decide to add to the end-points (pageview per article
>>> by country has come up many times, for example)
>>> * whether they consider the wish as satisfied if we offer a UI for the
>>> 3 different metrics, and perhaps over time add more metrics to the UI
>>> as they become available (not necessarily in 2016).
>>>
>>> Leila
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Marcel Ruiz Forns*
> Analytics Developer
> Wikimedia Foundation
>
_______________________________________________
Analytics mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics

Reply via email to