I think it would be interesting to be able to search for articles by views while retaining the existing qualifiers.
An example query might be: List articles with 500 - 750 views during the time of 12/15/2015 and 12/17/2015 (or maybe, if that is easier, just one day), only real users (no bots / spiders) accessing from mobile devices. The data is already there, it is just a different way of accessing it. While it is currently already possible to do this, if one wants to crawl a whole project, you need millions of API requests (at least for the bigger wikipedias like en or de and whatnot). Best, Felix <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Oliver Keyes <[email protected]> wrote: > Those sound like relatively advanced features a bit beyond the initial > offering, but like useful things to provide in the long-term, yeah. > I'm not sure what the status of the redirects inclusion (which is sort > of a question about the underlying data source rather than the > endpoint) is. > > On 15 January 2016 at 11:28, Alex Druk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > My two cents to discussion about endpoints to pageview API: > > 1) stats for categories that include all subcats and all pages, > > 2) include redirects to article counts > > > > All the best, > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Trying again, adding analytics@ (public e-mail list) > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> I also think we should start with exposing the 3 api's endpoints in a > >>> GUI, which - as Dan says - we know respond to community interests. And > then > >>> ask the community for more input, that could mean improvements to the > tool, > >>> new endpoints or completely new ideas... > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Dan Andreescu > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I'm ok if people want to take an iterative approach, I just want to > >>>> point out that the usage information is not very indicative of value > at this > >>>> point. The API is not widely used and the per-article endpoint is > expected > >>>> to be hit much much more than per-project or top simply because the > queries > >>>> are many orders of magnitude more granular. So we can't really judge > >>>> importance from that comparison. > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Leila Zia <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Dan Andreescu > >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> My question is: How are we going to define the requirements for the > >>>>>>> tool? I was planning to get some community input on defining which > stats > >>>>>>> would help contributors the most. What do you think? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My opinion here is that we should just expose everything the > pageview > >>>>>> API is capable of. It's only 3 different end points and they were > chosen > >>>>>> based on what the community found useful. As we add more endpoints > we can > >>>>>> keep checking if visualization is important. But of course if > others have > >>>>>> other more specific plans, we can wait for those tools to be built > and > >>>>>> iterate. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Building up on Dan's suggestion: I'd go with communicating and/or > >>>>> discussing the following with the community: > >>>>> > >>>>> * the 3 different metrics we can offer a UI for > >>>>> * what other metrics they find useful for their work. This will help > us > >>>>> collect information about what other kind of metrics we should offer > as an > >>>>> end-point if we decide to add to the end-points (pageview per > article by > >>>>> country has come up many times, for example) > >>>>> * whether they consider the wish as satisfied if we offer a UI for > the > >>>>> 3 different metrics, and perhaps over time add more metrics to the > UI as > >>>>> they become available (not necessarily in 2016). > >>>>> > >>>>> Leila > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Marcel Ruiz Forns > >>> Analytics Developer > >>> Wikimedia Foundation > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Analytics mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Thank you. > > > > Alex Druk, PhD > > wikipediatrends.com > > [email protected] > > (775) 237-8550 Google voice > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Analytics mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > > > > > -- > Oliver Keyes > Count Logula > Wikimedia Foundation > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics >
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
