Hi all, My two cents to discussion about endpoints to pageview API: 1) stats for categories that include all subcats and all pages, 2) include redirects to article counts
All the best, On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Nuria Ruiz <[email protected]> wrote: > Trying again, adding analytics@ (public e-mail list) > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Marcel Ruiz Forns <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I also think we should start with exposing the 3 api's endpoints in a >> GUI, which - as Dan says - we know respond to community interests. And then >> ask the community for more input, that could mean improvements to the tool, >> new endpoints or completely new ideas... >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Dan Andreescu <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> I'm ok if people want to take an iterative approach, I just want to >>> point out that the usage information is not very indicative of value at >>> this point. The API is not widely used and the per-article endpoint is >>> expected to be hit much much more than per-project or top simply because >>> the queries are many orders of magnitude more granular. So we can't really >>> judge importance from that comparison. >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Leila Zia <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Dan Andreescu <dandreescu@wikimedia >>>> .org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My question is: How are we going to define the requirements for the >>>>>> tool? I was planning to get some community input on defining which stats >>>>>> would help contributors the most. What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> My opinion here is that we should just expose everything the pageview >>>>> API is capable of. It's only 3 different end points and they were chosen >>>>> based on what the community found useful. As we add more endpoints we can >>>>> keep checking if visualization is important. But of course if others have >>>>> other more specific plans, we can wait for those tools to be built and >>>>> iterate. >>>>> >>>> >>>> ​Building up on Dan's suggestion: I'd go with communicating and/or >>>> discussing the following with the community: >>>> >>>> * the 3 different metrics we can offer a UI for >>>> * what other metrics they find useful for their work. This will help us >>>> collect information about what other kind of metrics we should offer as an >>>> end-point if we decide to add to the end-points (pageview per article >>>> by country has come up many times, for example) >>>> * whether they consider the wish as satisfied if we offer a UI for the >>>> 3 different metrics, and perhaps over time add more metrics to the UI >>>> as they become available (not necessarily in 2016). >>>> >>>> Leila >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Marcel Ruiz Forns* >> Analytics Developer >> Wikimedia Foundation >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Analytics mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics > > -- Thank you. Alex Druk, PhD wikipediatrends.com [email protected] (775) 237-8550 Google voice
_______________________________________________ Analytics mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/analytics
