I think we are owed a new SDK :-)
On May 3, 11:38 am, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as competitions go, I think this one is being pretty
> efficiently and impartially run. This is hardly a black box, and we
> all are getting a fair shake. A few points:
>
> 1) How many contests even have a server side to let you know when your
> app was looked at?
> 2) How many contests have 4 judges per entry, which are then analyzed
> for outliers?
> 3) If your application only was looked at for 2 minutes, that is your
> problem. This is a beauty contest and you need to provide a hook
> within 30 seconds. It's like American Idol
> 4) You have a 3% chance of winning at least $25K - those are pretty
> damn good odds relatively speaking
> 5) We all had the option to upload documentation. If you didn't get
> them interested with with the Read Me, they don't owe you any minimum
> amount of time
> 6) Prior to the submission date Dan was answering tons of questions.
> There were many threads discussing what people thought judges would
> look for and how to hit the right buttons
>
> I'm not saying that it wouldn't be nice to get even more communication
> or a post-mortem, or that it wouldn't have been helpful to know a bit
> more about the judging process, but let's not get on our high horses
> here and act like we are owed anything.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
