I certainly don't think I've wasted my time by entering the ADC, even though I currently think it's unlikely that I will win a final 50 place. I have always been interested in the potential of the Android platform and not primarily in the challenge (which I have always believed Google to have run in good faith).
The concerns I expressed previously arose because I failed to understand that judging was more evenly weighted between the application and its readme, than I had previously thought. This has since been clarified by Dan Morrill in posts to this forum. If I have any criticisms of the challenge, they are minor, but one would be that this wasn't clear prior to submission - I certainly remain positive about the opportunities that Google has already provided for Android developers via this challenge. Of course, the extent to which preparing a submission to the ADC (or ADC II) deviates from ones development roadmap will determine the amount of 'additional' (and possibly wasted) work that the submission will require. This will naturally vary between applications, but I for one certainly won't automatically disregard entering the ADC II. Tom. On May 4, 1:30 pm, q2dm1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a backup server, so it is very unlikey they both failed at the > same time. That said, I had 2 spot checks or whatever in total (<2 > minutes each). Don't think I'd waste my time on ADC2. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
