Well said. Hats off to you.
On May 4, 10:41 pm, javqui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After read the “terms and conditions”, the FAQ and the judging
> process, I was searching for a middle point between protection and
> innovation release before submit the readme and apk documents. I
> sacrifice “polish and appeal” points (with a deliberated limited
> android apk demo) and some non relevant “Originality” points.
> It was my play.
> I not sure if the judges evaluate the full application or not. I’m not
> sure if I have any chance to win with android. But I’m sure that with
> the limited information submitted, every judge has enough information
> to take a decision if my ideas and work has a chance or not. Judges
> did not need tons of information and did not need test the full
> application for hours. Judges only need experience, common sense and
> future vision, and I’m pretty sure that Google and android team select
> the judges according.
>
> A favorable consideration in the challenge will trigger important
> events for us and for many other participants. From our point of view,
> a favorable consideration is a position on the 50 or in the worst
> case, a constructive feedback for our concepts if we are not in the
> 50.
>
> Remember the two worlds from matrix, (the red and the blue pill). This
> is the real outside world.
>
> I will take the opportunity to say “thank you” for this experience to
> everybody involved on this challenge, including the people of android-
> developers discussion group.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
