After read the “terms and conditions”, the FAQ and the judging process, I was searching for a middle point between protection and innovation release before submit the readme and apk documents. I sacrifice “polish and appeal” points (with a deliberated limited android apk demo) and some non relevant “Originality” points. It was my play. I not sure if the judges evaluate the full application or not. I’m not sure if I have any chance to win with android. But I’m sure that with the limited information submitted, every judge has enough information to take a decision if my ideas and work has a chance or not. Judges did not need tons of information and did not need test the full application for hours. Judges only need experience, common sense and future vision, and I’m pretty sure that Google and android team select the judges according.
A favorable consideration in the challenge will trigger important events for us and for many other participants. From our point of view, a favorable consideration is a position on the 50 or in the worst case, a constructive feedback for our concepts if we are not in the 50. Remember the two worlds from matrix, (the red and the blue pill). This is the real outside world. I will take the opportunity to say “thank you” for this experience to everybody involved on this challenge, including the people of android- developers discussion group. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
