On May 4, 5:46 am, Mihai Fonoage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got a last hit in the same week, but on Monday, April 28. From what > I understood, they already new the top 100 applications at the end of > week 21 April - 27 April (since Dan wrote on May 4 and mentioned > something in the line of "100 finalists have identified on late last > week"); hence, in the week of 28 April - 4 May those top 100 were > (re)tested.
I'm pretty sure that Dan meant that they whittled it down to the top 100 by the end of this past week (May 2nd), not the 27th. There were A LOT of people with server activity during the week of the 28th. We've already found that only about 1/10 entrants is active on this board (from the challengemeter), so from a statistical standpoint I think its quite unlikely that we are all doing so well. Also remember that the winners will be announced on the WEEK of the 5th, not necessarily the 5th itself. That being said, I hope you're right because it would mean I'm still in the running too! On May 4, 5:46 am, Mihai Fonoage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I got a last hit in the same week, but on Monday, April 28. From what > I understood, they already new the top 100 applications at the end of > week 21 April - 27 April (since Dan wrote on May 4 and mentioned > something in the line of "100 finalists have identified on late last > week"); hence, in the week of 28 April - 4 May those top 100 were > (re)tested. > During this past weeks, I read about some of the applications that > were developed and I was impressed with what I saw. Great job > everyone! > > Mihai Fonoage > > On May 4, 10:02 am, SungSuh Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > He said "100 finalists have identifed on late last week" and announce > > winner "Next week" > > I got a last and fifth hit in friday 7:00 pm. If it was outlier > > mitigation process, they just have finished identifying 100 finalists. > > > Perhaps we should wait until "9 May". It's OK. Submissions were more > > than expectation. > > And we want fair judging process rather than announcement of winner in > > time. > > > Publish the list of the top 100 apps is a good idea. > > Just list of title and name of submitter will be good. It won't hurt > > the privacy. > > Not just 50 winners, but 50~100 ranked submissions are worth to be > > announced! They are 100 of 1788 applications. > > > On 5월4일, 오전8시00분, Ram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > From a post by Dan M > > > onhttp://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge/browse_thread/thread... > > > > ".....It looks like we are still on track to > > > announce those winners next week. > > > A different set of judges is reviewing the 100 applications. The top > > > 100 > > > applications are "reset" and rejudged from scratch by a different > > > group of > > > judges, who have no knowledge of the previous judges' > > > scores. .............." > > > > I've seen a lot of speculation about the evaluation status on this > > > forum, but this is the first official communication I've seen that > > > mentions that Google is on track to announce the winners next week. > > > > It is a bit unclear on whether the the new set of judges have started > > > reviewing the 100 apps ...... or whether the top 100 apps have not yet > > > been identified (but I'm assuming that the new set of judges has > > > started reviewng the 100 apps) > > > ---------- > > > Btw Dan, will it be possible to publish the list of the top 100 apps > > > (or inform the 100 submitters individually if there are privacy > > > concerns with publishing the list). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
