LOL. Chris, see its tough to be funny ;)
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree it's pointless getting people's hopes up - that is why I did > the post. We shouldn't start randomly throwing out dates unless we > are clear that it is speculation. That is why people were surprised > by the initial "delay" even though Dan had mentioned things were on > track to get done on the week of the 5th instead of the 5th itself. > > I didn't do it in Muthu's thread for two reasons: > > 1) I was trying to be funny - guess I failed > 2) People don't always read an entire thread, so if they only skimmed > the original post, they might have taken it as fact > > > > On May 5, 10:53 am, Apache787 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please stop these kinds of messages. It is a bit annoying to open up > > the emails and find stuff like this. We all know the amount of work > > the judges have to do, AND it does state that it is the WEEK of May > > 5th, not May 5th. It is a bit pointless to keep on getting the hopes > > of people only to crush it with another "DELAY!" topic. Regardless, > > this would have more appropriately been posted in Muthu's thread as to > > correct it, not start a new one. > > > -- take care, Muthu Ramadoss. http://mobeegal.in find stuff closer. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
