On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> I agree it's pointless getting people's hopes up - that is why I did
> the post.  We shouldn't start randomly throwing out dates unless we
> are clear that it is speculation.  That is why people were surprised
> by the initial "delay" even though Dan had mentioned things were on
> track to get done on the week of the 5th instead of the 5th itself.
>
> I didn't do it in Muthu's thread for two reasons:
>
Chris,

>
> 1) I was trying to be funny - guess I failed

You are not allowed to be funny on this list. Please keep your comments to
useless speculation and misinformation, as you will have better success
here.

Thanks,
Shane


>
> 2) People don't always read an entire thread, so if they only skimmed
> the original post, they might have taken it as fact
>
>
>
> On May 5, 10:53 am, Apache787 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please stop these kinds of messages.  It is a bit annoying to open up
> > the emails and find stuff like this.  We all know the amount of work
> > the judges have to do, AND it does state that it is the WEEK of May
> > 5th, not May 5th.  It is a bit pointless to keep on getting the hopes
> > of people only to crush it with another "DELAY!" topic.  Regardless,
> > this would have more appropriately been posted in Muthu's thread as to
> > correct it, not start a new one.
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to