I am not sure that would be fair. An argument against is what about people who spent all their time polishing and perfecting a small amount of features than those who just mocked stuff up, doing things roughly and inefficiently.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:09 AM, jarmohak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As far as I've understood, it's not required, so basically you may > create a "demo" app, and "complete" it if and when you get to second > round. Thatwise anyways it would be vice, so ppl don't have to do > unnecessary job just because their app didn't get to the (semi)finals. > If anyone has better info, I'd be glad to hear about it. > > On Mar 24, 10:03 pm, hmmmmm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > still no answer. > > i think all the google man are quite busy with other things. > > plz others developers comment about the questions. > > im badly needed the answers > > > > best regards > > rst > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Announcing the new M5 SDK! http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2008/02/android-sdk-m5-rc14-now-available.html For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
